Rebecca Kay Bright, Author

A little sample of the novel I'm working on. Enjoy!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The Prince Be ((sample)) In a time far removed from ours and nearly forgotten by modern man this story takes place. It seems since the beginning of the Early Modern era – the 1400s – everyone has come up with a story of “King Arthur’s court.” Well this, my friend is the first part of what happened. Why just part you ask? Because mi-lord asked for a simple tale to close this evening’s festivities; if the court is pleased with this story this simple bard would be honored to continue this saga when mi-lord and milady sees fit to call for it. Let your mind recall the days of old when the Roman Empire was in shambles and the eastern barbarians’ attacks where ever so frequent. Remember when Briton’s eastern and southern coasts had been badly pillaged and the barbarians had for the last many years started establishing settlements in these areas. Remember….. The Barbarians a

    Navigating the Complexities of Internet Regulation: A Call for Action Against Violent Pornography      In the ever-evolving landscape of the internet, the debate over regulation, particularly concerning sexually explicit material, remains contentious. The question of how far regulation should extend is one that will continue to spark heated discussions for years to come. At the heart of this debate lies the clash between the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment and the need to protect individuals from harmful content, such as child pornography and other violent forms of exploitation.      The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides significant protection to expressions of speech. However, it's crucial to recognize that this protection is not absolute, especially when it comes to forms of expression that cause tangible harm. Child pornography and other violent depictions are not shielded by the First Amendment, as they are illegal in most jurisdictions a

Judicial Policymaking      We must remember that the Supreme Court’s job is to look at the laws and the cases in front of them and compare them with the Constitution. If the laws or a prior decision in a case is unconstitutional, it is the Supreme Court's job to find them so. What many see as the Supreme Court making laws is really the Supreme Court setting precedent. This action of taking into account a higher court’s (or another court’s) rulings and ruling similarly has been common in all courts that stem from the English court system model – we can see similar occurrences in British, Canadian, and Austrian courts as well as our own. The Supreme Court of the United States’ job is not to enforce laws or their rulings overall. The Supreme Court’s job is to set legal standards of law while enforcement falls into the jurisdiction of the executive branch and through the executive branch the various law enforcement agencies and the lower courts follow precedent.      On the subjec