When Peace Is Met with Force: Nonviolent Protest and State Repression
When Peace Is Met with Force: Nonviolent Protest and State Repression
By Rebecca Kay Bright
They came in peace. They sat, they sang, they prayed. And for that, they were beaten, hosed, jailed, and shot. America’s most transformative protests have often been peaceful — from lunch counters in Greensboro to forest encampments in Atlanta. Yet the belief that nonviolence ensures safety has been repeatedly shattered. The truth is more brutal: in America, peace can itself be a provocation.
---
A Counter, a Catalyst
On February 1, 1960, four Black college students — Ezell Blair Jr., David Richmond, Franklin McCain, and Joseph McNeil — walked into a Woolworth’s in Greensboro, North Carolina, and sat at a “whites only” lunch counter. They asked for coffee. They were denied. They stayed.
Over the following days, white patrons cursed, shoved, spat, and dumped food on the young men. Police stood by. Newspapers mocked them. But the students remained, refusing to leave. “It wasn’t about the food,” McCain later said. “It was about the right to sit. The right to be treated as human.”
Their quiet resistance sparked a movement. Sit‑ins spread across the South. Thousands joined. Many were arrested, suspended, or expelled. Some were beaten on sidewalks. Some were jailed for weeks. Yet the dignity of their silence exposed the raw cruelty of segregation more powerfully than any speech could. The sit‑ins became a moral lens that forced America to look inward.
---
The Price of Peace
What few textbooks explain is that nonviolence did not protect these protestors. In Jackson, Mississippi, activists were drenched in condiments, and cigarettes were extinguished on their necks. In Rock Hill, South Carolina, students were dragged from their stools and kicked unconscious. Nothing and no one was spared — not girls in dresses, not ministers in collars, not teenagers simply demanding to order a sandwich.
By 1964, the Civil Rights Act outlawed segregation in public spaces after years of sit‑ins, marches, boycotts, and bus rides. Yet for many of the movement’s foot soldiers, the bruises, trauma, and stigma of protest never faded.
---
In the Woods, Another Front
Decades later, a new generation of nonviolent activists found themselves in harm’s way — this time among the old‑growth forests of the Pacific Northwest. In the 1980s and ’90s, environmental groups used direct‑action tactics to oppose clear‑cutting of endangered trees. Protestors chained themselves to logging equipment, perched in “tree‑sits” for weeks, and blockaded roads with their bodies.
“We were trying to protect the lungs of the planet,” said Sarah Halvorsen, who was just 22 when she was arrested near the Willamette National Forest. “We weren’t violent. We didn’t yell. But the police came in like we were criminals.” Halvorsen was dragged by her hair through gravel. Another activist, Jason Grove, was struck with a baton hard enough to fracture his wrist. “We thought peace would protect us,” Grove said. “It didn’t. It made us easier targets.”
Despite their treatment, these protests helped push forward legislation on sustainable logging and land preservation. But the message was clear: when you disrupt profit, even without violence, you will be punished.
---
Water and Fire: Standing Rock
In 2016, that lesson echoed again along the Missouri River at Standing Rock. Thousands of Indigenous people and their allies camped for months to protest the Dakota Access Pipeline, which threatened sacred land and drinking water for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. The camps were centered on prayer and ceremony. Youth runners carried petitions across state lines. Grandmothers cooked communal meals. Tribal elders led sunrise blessings each morning.
Then came the response.
Militarized police surrounded the camps. Armored vehicles rumbled across open plains. Protestors, who called themselves Water Protectors, were met with tear gas, rubber bullets, flash‑bang grenades, and water cannons in subzero temperatures. “I was praying with a feather when they shot me with a rubber bullet,” said Waniya Locke, a teacher and tribal member. “I had bruises for weeks. But I was lucky. Others lost their eyes. Some nearly died.”
Over 800 people were arrested, medics were detained, and journalists were obstructed. Even as the pipeline was built, Standing Rock changed the conversation, inspiring a global wave of Indigenous‑led climate action and revealing how deeply militarized protest policing has become in America.
---
Atlanta’s Forest, and a Funeral
In 2022, protestors gathered in the South River Forest outside Atlanta, Georgia, to oppose construction of a proposed police training facility. Activists argued it would destroy one of the city’s last green spaces and further entrench militarized policing. The protest was peaceful: art, teach‑ins, music, meditation, and gardens filled the encampment.
Police labeled them “domestic terrorists.”
In January 2023, during a raid on the protest encampment, officers shot and killed Tortuguita, a 26‑year‑old nonbinary activist. Law enforcement claimed Tortuguita fired first, but independent investigations contradicted that narrative; bullet wounds in their hands suggested they were trying to shield themselves. “They were always smiling,” said fellow protester Jules Terrell. “They shared granola and poetry. The idea that they were violent is obscene.”
Tortuguita’s death marked a turning point. Protests erupted nationwide. Chalk reading “Stop Cop City” appeared on sidewalks from Atlanta to Portland. But the crackdown intensified, with broad surveillance and sweeping indictments under statutes usually reserved for organized crime.
---
Anti‑ICE Protests and Federal Enforcement Backlash (2026)
In early 2026, demonstrations opposing federal immigration enforcement highlighted a disturbing continuation of this pattern. In Minneapolis, the fatal shooting of ICU nurse Alex Pretti by U.S. Border Patrol agents during a federal operation sparked public outrage and large marches demanding accountability and an end to heavy federal tactics. Earlier that season, another Minnesota woman, Renée Nicole Good, was killed by immigration enforcement agents in a separate incident that drew national attention and grief.
Tens of thousands took to the streets in Minneapolis and other cities, including Los Angeles, to protest these deaths and to oppose expanded federal immigration operations. These gatherings were organized, largely peaceful, and rooted in calls for justice, transparency, and humane policy. Yet they were met by heavy law enforcement presence, detentions, and questions about accountability and the use of force.
In Portland, a federal judge temporarily barred ICE from using tear gas and crowd‑control projectiles against demonstrators after agents deployed such measures against crowds that included children. These responses underscored civil liberties concerns and the ongoing challenge faced by peaceful demonstrators opposing federal authority.
---
A Deadly Pattern
The story repeats — from Greensboro to the woods, from water to forests, from federal policy protests to local encampments. Nonviolent protestors, often young and idealistic, step into public space with open hands and clear eyes. They are met with batons, tear gas, slander, and bullets.
Peace does not protect them. It never has.
---
Call to Action
We are taught that peace is safe, that nonviolence is the moral high ground, and that restraint will be rewarded with justice. But history tells a harder truth. Peaceful protest may change laws, shift culture, and expose injustice — but it does not shield the protester from harm.
And still, they march.
They march because silence is complicity. They kneel because standing has cost too much. They sing because it is the only way to drown out the sirens. They resist not with fists but with presence. They remind us that dissent, even when whispered, is sacred.
It is not enough to admire their courage. We must protect it. We must remember that every right we hold was paid for in bruises, jail time, and the blood spilled by those who refused to swing back.
When history looks at this generation, let it not say they watched peace be punished and said nothing. Let it be said they stood behind the stillness. Let it be said they stood up for the ones who sat down.
---
Sources
Civil Rights & Environmental Protests
History.com. “How the Greensboro Four Sit‑In Sparked a Movement.” https://www.history.com/articles/greensboro-four-sit-in-civil-rights
NPR. “In Their Own Words: The ‘Water Protectors’ of Standing Rock.” https://www.npr.org/2016/12/11/505147166/in-their-own-words-the-water-protectors-of-standing-rock
MPR News. “The Protests at Standing Rock: Oil, Water, Race and Treaty Rights.” https://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/12/20/tw-standing-rock
Atlanta / Cop City & Tortuguita
Human Rights Campaign. “Remembering Tortuguita, Indigenous Queer and Non‑Binary Environmental Activist and Forest Defender.” https://www.hrc.org/news/remembering-tortuguita-indigenous-queer-and-non-binary-environmental-activist-and-forest-defender
Anti‑ICE 2026 Protests & Federal Response
Reuters. “Tens of thousands protest in Minneapolis over fatal ICE shooting.” https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fatal-ice-shooting-minneapolis-activist-sets-stage-national-protests-2026-01-10/
FOX 9 Minneapolis‑St. Paul. “Alex Pretti memorial march marks 1 month since fatal shooting.” https://www.fox9.com/news/alex-pretti-memorial-march-marks-1-month-fatal-shooting-feb-21
WBUR News. “What to know about an ICE officer’s fatal shooting of a woman in Minneapolis.” https://www.wbur.org/news/2026/01/08/what-to-know-fatal-shooting-ice-minneapolis
Los Angeles Times. “LAPD says more than 50 people detained during protests against ICE tactics.” https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-01-31/demonstrations-against-ice-tactics-continue-in-la
The Guardian. “Judge temporarily bans ICE from using tear gas and projectiles on protesters in Portland.” https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/03/portland-judge-ice-teargas-projectiles