The Price of War: How America’s History With Iran Has Already Shaped Ordinary Lives
The Price of War: How America’s History With Iran Has Already Shaped Ordinary Lives
.
.
Most people do not wake up in the morning thinking about geopolitics.
They wake up thinking about how they will get to work, how they will take care of their families, how they will fill up the car or truck so they can make it through the day. They wake up thinking about paying their bills and keeping food on the table.
For millions of Americans, driving is not optional. It is how they earn a living. It is how they take their children to school, reach appointments, pick up groceries, and commute to shifts that pay the bills. And it is often the first place you see war in everyday life.
Gas or diesel prices climbed almost overnight a few days ago. Propane prices followed quickly. Anyone who uses fuel for a car, a truck, a generator, or heat at home will soon feel that change in their bank account and on their receipt at the pump.
The reason is not magic. It is the global energy system reacting to conflict. When tensions rise in the Middle East, energy markets respond immediately. And when the United States confronts another nation there, the cost falls first on ordinary people.
The current conflict involving the United States and Iran has already pushed oil prices past one hundred dollars per barrel. That does not stay at the oil level. It trickles down. Diesel fuels trucks that move food and goods. Increased diesel costs contribute to higher food, construction, and consumer prices. Fuel affects every part of the economy.
If you have a vehicle that runs on fuel, now is the moment to top off the tank. If you rely on propane for your grill or for home heating, consider filling those tanks while prices are still relatively stable. History shows that once war in the Middle East escalates, energy prices rarely retreat quickly. They surge first and settle much later.
To understand how we got here, and why this matters far beyond the price at the pump, it helps to step back and look at the long and painful history between the United States and Iran.
.
A Coup That Laid the Groundwork
The modern era of U.S. involvement in Iran began in August 1953. The United States and the United Kingdom orchestrated a covert overthrow of Iran’s democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh. Mossadegh had come to power after nationalizing Iran’s oil industry, which had previously been dominated by Western interests. Those governments feared losing access to Iran’s oil and worried about broader geopolitical influence during the Cold War.
The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and British intelligence coordinated Operation Ajax. They used propaganda, street protests, and bribery to destabilize Mossadegh’s government and led a coup that removed him from office. In his place, they restored Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, a ruler who aligned Iran with Western powers and maintained a pro‑American monarchy for the next twenty five years.
That intervention left deep resentment among many Iranians. The feeling of foreign powers determining their nation’s future became a central memory in Iranian political identity.
Under the shah, Iran’s revenues continued to flow out of the country, its political opposition was suppressed, and dissent was treated ruthlessly by the secret police. Many Iranians began to see the shah’s government as corrupt and disconnected from their needs. That resentment built slowly, until it could no longer be contained.
.
The Iranian Revolution
By late 1978, widespread protests rocked Iran. Students, workers, religious leaders, and ordinary citizens took to the streets, demanding an end to the shah’s rule. In January 1979, the shah fled the country. A passionate religious leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, returned from exile and quickly rose to power. The result was a revolution that transformed Iran into an Islamic republic.
The new government of Iran made opposition to foreign interference a core principle. That sentiment became the backdrop for one of the most significant crises in modern U.S. foreign policy.
.
The Iran Hostage Crisis
In November 1979, a group of Iranian students stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. They took 52 American diplomats and embassy staff hostage and held them for 444 days, beginning the Iran Hostage Crisis. This was more than a diplomatic incident. It was a national trauma for the United States.
The crisis began after the United States allowed the exiled shah to enter the country for medical treatment. Iranian revolutionaries saw this as a possible first step toward reinstalling him. Their anger boiled over into violence at the embassy, and the hostages were held for over a year.
During that time, the United States tried negotiations. It also tried a risky military rescue mission in the Iranian desert called Operation Eagle Claw. That mission failed when several helicopters malfunctioned, killing eight U.S. servicemen.
The hostage crisis ended in January 1981, on the very day Ronald Reagan was sworn in as president. For Americans, the protestors holding the hostages became a symbol of U.S. humiliation. For Iranians, it was seen as a necessary act of defiance and sovereignty after years of interference.
But the economic consequences of upheaval in Iran were already being felt. The disruption in Iranian oil production, combined with earlier OPEC production cuts and general Middle Eastern instability, contributed to sharp increases in global fuel prices. Throughout the United States, gas stations saw long lines, shortages, and prices that impacted daily life in almost every community. Those fuel disruptions played a role in public dissatisfaction with the economy and influenced politics throughout the late 1970s and early 1980s.
.
The Iran–Iraq War
Just as the hostage crisis was still unresolved, a new conflict erupted across Iran’s western border.
In September 1980, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq invaded Iran. Hussein believed Iran was weakened after the revolution and sought to seize oil‑rich territory along the border. What followed became the Iran–Iraq War, an eight year conflict that became one of the longest and deadliest wars of the twentieth century.
Both sides launched massive attacks, targeted oil infrastructure, and even used chemical weapons against troops and civilians. The war did not produce a clear territorial victory. When it finally ended in 1988, both nations were exhausted and devastated, and millions of people had been killed or wounded.
The conflict affected global energy markets once again because Iran and Iraq were major oil producers. Production instability and threats to shipping increased fuel costs worldwide and disrupted economic stability in many countries, including the United States.
.
The Iran‑Contra Affair
Less well known among ordinary Americans, but no less consequential, was a mid‑1980s scandal that revealed secret U.S. foreign policy operations. Even as the United States publicly opposed Iran’s government and its policies, senior officials in the Reagan administration arranged for secret arms sales to Iran in hopes of securing the release of Americans held by allied militant groups in Lebanon.
The profits from these arms sales were then illegally diverted to fund the Contras, anti‑communist rebel fighters in Nicaragua. This violated explicit congressional bans on supporting the Contras. Several senior administration officials were implicated. Oliver North, a Marine officer on the National Security Council, became the public face of the scandal, famously testifying before Congress that he had acted out of national security concerns.
The Iran‑Contra affair revealed a willingness within the U.S. government to conduct covert operations that directly violated U.S. law and congressional authority. The fallout eroded public trust in government and highlighted the complexities and contradictions of U.S. foreign policy.
.
The Iraq War and Weapons of Mass Destruction
All of these past crises shape how Americans today view the justifications for military action. That is especially true when government leaders invoke the specter of weapons of mass destruction.
In 2003 the United States invaded Iraq under the leadership of George W. Bush, claiming that Saddam Hussein’s regime possessed chemical, biological, and potentially nuclear weapons. Those claims were used as the central rationale for war.
After the invasion, years of investigation found that Iraq had long since dismantled its WMD programs. No active stockpiles were discovered. Intelligence failures, misinterpretations, and political pressure combined to produce a flawed justification for a war that cost hundreds of thousands of lives and destabilized the region for decades.
The parallels with today’s conflict in Iran are striking. Once again, claims about weapons programs are being publicly cited to justify military action. History should make that a matter of scrutiny rather than unquestioned acceptance.
.
Why This Matters Now
The economic consequences of conflict in the Middle East are felt first and most directly at the pump. Oil prices rise. Gasoline and diesel rise. The cost of transporting food and everyday goods rises.
Ordinary Americans experience these impacts long before they see images of bombed targets or read diplomatic statements. The ripple effects touch every household budget.
Beyond the economics, the political and human consequences run much deeper. Wars do not exist in isolation. The U.S. interventions of the past helped shape the conditions that exist today. Policies that removed a popular leader, backed a closely aligned authoritarian government, or engaged in covert operations created cycles of resentment and conflict that reverberate across generations.
The current escalation with Iran, and the language being used to justify it, resembles past patterns more than it differs from them. That resemblance has consequences. It matters to families trying to afford fuel, to farmers trying to keep equipment running, to workers who need reliable transportation, and to citizens who believe their government should be held accountable for decisions that affect millions of lives.
History should not be used to repeat mistakes. It should be used to learn from them.
Sources
-
Iran Hostage Crisis – Britannica:
https://www.britannica.com/event/Iran-hostage-crisis -
Oil Shock / Gas Shortages 1979 (impact on U.S. economy) – Federal Reserve History:
https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/oil-shock-of-1978-79 -
Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988) – History.com:
https://www.history.com/topics/middle-east/iran-iraq-war -
Iran-Iraq War Overview – Britannica:
https://www.britannica.com/event/Iran-Iraq-War -
Iran-Contra Affair – Britannica:
https://www.britannica.com/event/Iran-Contra-Affair -
Iraq WMD Controversy & 2003 Invasion Context – Brookings Institution:
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/iraq-war-lessons-learned/ Kinzer, Stephen. All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
Sick, Gary. All Fall Down: America’s Tragic Encounter with Iran. Random House, 1985.
Abrahamian, Ervand. Iran Between Two Revolutions. Princeton University Press, 1982.
Bowden, Mark. Guests of the Ayatollah: The Iran Hostage Crisis: The First Battle in America’s War with Militant Islam. Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006.
Hiro, Dilip. The Longest War: The Iran–Iraq Military Conflict. Routledge, 1991.
Walsh, Lawrence E. Final Report of the Independent Counsel for Iran/Contra Matters. 1993.
Full text: https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/
Risen, James. State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration. Free Press, 2006.
U.S. Energy Information Administration – Historical Gasoline Prices: https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/